The Challenge: A December 2026 Deadline and No Geolocation Data
This company had been exporting certified FSC timber to Germany and France for 11 years. Their legacy compliance process was spreadsheet-based, with harvest permits scanned and filed by lot number. It was functional for the certification regimes of the past decade — and completely inadequate for EUDR.
EUDR requires parcel-level GPS coordinates for every shipment — not supplier warehouse addresses, not FMU references. Individual plot polygons, tied to the specific ground where timber was harvested. Their existing supplier documentation covered mill addresses and broad harvest zones. It did not contain what EUDR requires.
An internal audit in April 2026 found geolocation coverage at 23% of active lots. Manual GPS collection from field teams would take an estimated 4–5 months at existing capacity — more time than remained before their first scheduled EUDR customs inspection.
Due diligence statement drafting was running 8+ hours per shipment through external consultants. At their export volume, a compliant DDS workflow would require adding 3 FTE or outsourcing at cost that made the EU market economically unviable.
Why URTI: The Intake Wizard Changed the Math
They evaluated three options: build internal GPS collection infrastructure, continue with the manual consultant DDS workflow, or adopt the URTI platform. The first option required hardware deployment timelines incompatible with the deadline. The second was cost-prohibitive at scale.
The decision to adopt URTI turned on one capability: the document intake wizard's OCR-to-GPS extraction pipeline. Their suppliers had physical harvest permits and forest maps — the intake wizard could photograph those documents and extract GPS data automatically using computer vision, bypassing the need for new GPS hardware deployment across remote harvest areas.
A pilot with 40 lots ran in week one. OCR accuracy on scanned permit documents was sufficient to extract plot-level coordinates in 34 of 40 cases. The remaining 6 required manual GPS entry — a 15% exception rate versus 100% manual baseline. The math was straightforward: adopt the platform or lose the EU market.
Implementation: Six Weeks from Pilot to Certification
Field teams photographed harvest permits via the URTI intake wizard. OCR extracted species, GPS coordinates, harvest dates, and permit numbers. Extracted fields were reviewed in the pre-submission preview before NFCC issuance.
Each reviewed lot was registered as an asset in the URTI system. NFCC certificates were automatically issued with a SHA-256 verification hash, lot-level GPS data, species classification, and stage status (Registration).
As lots moved from harvest to milling, lifecycle events were recorded in the URTI platform. Chain-of-custody remained intact through each stage transition, satisfying EUDR's traceability requirement without additional documentation.
At shipment time, the NFCC certificate data populated EUDR Due Diligence Statement fields automatically. Statement preparation time dropped from 8+ hours to approximately 35 minutes per shipment.
Results: Before and After
| Metric | Before URTI | After URTI |
|---|---|---|
| Geolocation coverage | 23% of active lots | 100% |
| DDS preparation time / shipment | 8+ hours | ~35 minutes |
| NFCC certificates issued | 0 | 847 |
| EUDR compliance assessment score | 31 / 100 | 89 / 100 |
| DDS submission readiness | Not ready | 100% of lots |
What Comes Next: Supply Chain Financing
With NFCC certificates covering 100% of active lots, the company is now evaluating URTI's supply chain financing layer — which unlocks DeFi-based working capital against EUDR-certified timber inventory. For operators who have already built the compliance infrastructure, this converts certification into a balance sheet asset rather than a pure cost center.
The path from compliance investment to financing eligibility is direct: verified GPS data and immutable NFCC certificates are precisely the documentation that financing counterparties require to underwrite timber inventory. Operators who delayed compliance are building the same infrastructure later, at higher cost, without the financing upside available now.
The company in this case study has requested to remain anonymous pending their formal EUDR DDS filing. Metrics and outcomes are reported as provided. Industry, volume, and timeline details are accurate.
Check Your EUDR Readiness Score
The URTI assessment scores your compliance posture across geolocation coverage, documentation status, and DDS workflow readiness — in under 5 minutes.
Start the EUDR Readiness Assessment →